Hungary (2021)

0 Total number of institutions
0 Number of Public Institutions
0 Demo survey health index number

SSH Health Index

NB! This is a demo survey based on a limited number of responses. Hungary's cumulative result across all categories: 2.28/5.

SSH Country Landscape

The general impact of academic rankings, research evaluation, and funding mechanisms on Hungary's SSH.

SSH Health Index

NB! This is a demo survey based on a limited number of responses. Hungary's cumulative result across all categories: 2.28/5.

SSH and Education Policies

Please think of the policies in your professional home country related to EDUCATION in the domains of SSH in general. In your honest opinion, what is the effect of these policies on the current status of SSH? (Please don’t think of career prospects, etc. for SSH graduates, but of the SSH’s potential for development as *educational and research* domains, and for career development for people *employed in academia*.)

1 star = negative
2 stars = rather negative
3 stars = neither positive nor negative
4 stars = rather positive
5 stars = positive

RESULT: 2.16/5

Hungary (2021)
Europe

Comments

SSH and Research Policies

Now think of the policies in your home country related to RESEARCH in the domains of SSH in general. In your honest opinion, what is the effect of these policies on the current status of SSH? (Please don’t think of career prospects, etc. for SSH graduates, but of the SSH’s potential for development as *educational and research* domains, and for career development for people *employed in academia*, etc.)

1 star = negative
2 stars = rather negative
3 stars = neither positive nor negative
4 stars = rather positive
5 stars = positive

RESULT: 1.95/5

Hungary (2021)
Europe

SSH Future: Relevance and Importance

In terms of RELEVANCE and IMPORTANCE, what are your personal expectations about the future of SSH in your professional home country?

1 star = there will be SUBSTANTIAL LOSS of relevance and importance
2 stars = there will be SOME LOSS of relevance and importance
3 stars = their relevance and importance will remain the SAME
4 stars = they will GAIN SOME relevance and importance
5 stars = they will GAIN MUCH relevance and importance

RESULT: 2.37/5

Hungary (2021)
Europe

Comments

SSH Future: Education

In terms of national policies related to EDUCATION, what are your personal expectations about the future of SSH in your professional home country?

1 star = negative
2 stars = rather negative
3 stars = neither positive nor negative
4 stars = rather positive
5 stars = positive

RESULT: 2.04/5

Hungary (2021)
Europe

Comments

SSH Future: Research

In terms of national policies related to RESEARCH, what are your personal expectations about the future of SSH in your professional home country?

1 star = negative
2 stars = rather negative
3 stars = neither positive nor negative
4 stars = rather positive
5 stars = positive

RESULT: 2.12/5

Hungary (2021)
Europe

Comments

Attitude to Research Output Evaluation

Please think of the official systems for evaluation of research output in your professional home country. What do you think of the effect they have on SSH in general?

1 star = negative
2 stars = rather negative
3 stars = neither positive nor negative
4 stars = rather positive
5 stars = positive

RESULT: 2.70/5

Hungary (2021)
Europe

Comments

Attitude to Local Funding Systems

When you talk to junior colleagues in your field/domain about their professional future in general, how do they feel about it?

1 star = pessimistic
2 stars = rather pessimistic
3 stars = neither pessimistic nor optimistic
4 stars = rather optimistic
5 stars = optimistic

RESULT: 2.41/5

Hungary (2021)
Europe

Comments

SSH Country Landscape

The general impact of academic rankings, research evaluation, and funding mechanisms on Hungary's SSH.

Rankings & Evaluation

Independent National Academic Ranking Systems

Independent National Ranking Systems

Universitas Press Hungary is an independent higher education expert group who published the first higher education ranking in Hungary in 2001 under the name “UnivPRESS Ranking”. Universitas Press Hungary was initiated by an independent expert group, realized with a contribution from a Hungarian governmental higher education agency, and published via the most popular weekly national business magazine and on the official website of the Hungarian Government’s higher education office. It has been issued in several editions over the past decade, several among them in cooperation with the National Higher Education Information Office/Education Public Service Non-Profit Company. Today the UnivPress Ranking is managed by the Social Communication Research Group at Eötvös Loránd University (Faculty of Education and Psychology) in cooperation with Tudástársadalom Foundation.

Other independent academic rankings in Hungary include:

  • Felvi-ranking (using multiple criteria in methodology in addition to statistics and indicators, published since 2005 as a new, independent ranking publication entitled Felvi-rangsor – Egyetemek, főiskolák mérlegen [Felvi Ranking—Universities and Colleges on the Scales])
  • HVG’s Diploma ranking, initially created by the Education Research Institute (based on 8 criteria), since 2009 HVG published by Felvi-ranking
  • Népszabadság “Felsőoktatás felsőfokon” Ranking (ranking 50 majors based on 2 criteria)
  • Figyelő University Ranking has been continuously published since 2017 based on data from the Education Authority; it ranks 12 fields: agrarian, humanities, economics, informatics, legal, technical, medical and health sciences, teacher training, sports science, social sciences, and natural sciences.
  • Heti Válasz (in 3 popular majors, using 6 criteria in methodology) has been publishing its independent ranking publication called “Navigátor” since 2008.

Ranking criteria

Each of these rankings compares a different set of characteristics of the respective university, and thus the rankings are hardly comparable. Also, there are currently no national ranking systems that take into consideration research outputs. György Kampis has conducted a one-time comparative analysis of research outputs among universities and departments, but there is no regular assessment that is used for any ranking. While international ranking systems use research as a criterion, it is unlikely that there will be a separate Hungarian ranking of that sort. As well, ranking institutions do not necessarily reveal their ranking methodologies and hence there may be no publicly available information on how data is collected and analyzed.

The original UnivPRESS Rankings are prepared based on nationwide research and data collection, covering the vast majority of educational fields. There are five nationwide representative sociological student opinion surveys, four lecturer-employer ranking opinion surveys, six professional conferences, a time series database – which is unique to Hungary – and approximately fifteen printed sheets of study papers underlying the rankings.

Data sources include:

  • Data of the Ministry of Education and Culture based on information provision by the institutions themselves
  • Application and admission data from the National Higher Education Information Centre
  • Data from the Council for National Scientific Students’ Circles
  • Direct institutional data collection by the National Higher Education Information Centre
  • Representative empirical sociological research involving university and college students

Felvi applies the same criteria too all majors/disciplines as they evaluate all institutions and departments within institutions. The ranking system is based on over 100 criteria, with the following among them:

  • Quality of faculty
  • Institutional infrastructure
  • Scientific potential of institutions
  • Student assessment of institutional services
  • Student assessment of diploma value
  • Employer reviews
  • Teacher-expert opinions
  • Student prestige rankings of institutions
  • Student quality
  • Other institutional characteristics

To develop the ranking system, the following institutions are cooperating:

  • Educatio Társadalmi Szolgáltató Nonprofit Kft. – Országos Felsőoktatási Információs Központ (closed in December of 2015) [Educatio Social Service Provider Nonprofit Ltd. – National Higher Education Information Center]
  • Universitas Press Felsőoktatás-kutató Műhely [Universitas Press Higher Education Research Workshop]
  • JELTÁRS Jelenkor Társadalomkutató Műhely [‘Present-day’ Social Research Workshop]
  • Magyar Kereskedelmi és Iparkamara Gazdaság- és Vállalkozáselemző Intézet [Hungarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Institute of Economic and Business Analysis]
  • MIMIKRI Közvélemény- és Piackutató Kft. [ MIMIKRI Public Opinion and Market Research Ltd.]
  • Medián Közvélemény- és Piackutató Intézet [Median Institute for Public Opinion and Market Research]
  • GfK Hungária Piackutató Intézet [GfK Hungária Market Research Institute]

Figyelő University Ranking compares and ranks universities and colleges that offer undergraduate and/or undivided programs (5-6 years of study that result in BA and MA) on the basis of student and teacher excellence, placement indicators, and international mobility data. The ranking does not include:

  • Higher education institutions with fewer than 10 full-time students (undergraduate or undivided programs)
  • Higher education institutions with faith service training, art or broadcast art trainings

In 2020, a total of 32 universities were ranked as a result, based on the following criteria:

  • Number of applicants and admissions
  • Outcomes of admitted students
  • Student and teacher performance
  • Student mobility (number of students attracted from remote areas)
  • Post-graduation performance

The Heti Válasz Ranking system has changed its methodology multiple times, and uses a complex indexing system. The index is constructed as an arithmetic average of 6 ‘elementary’ indicators for economics, mechanical engineering, informatics and law, and 5 for the fields of tourism and communication. Heti Válasz closed in the summer of 2018 and was replaced by Válasz Online, which was discontinued as well.

Scientometric/bibliometric channels

None of the Hungarian ranking systems use bibliometric data, which clearly distinguishes the system from international standards (Csoka et al. 2019, p. 754). More precisely, the number of publications or the extent of citations does not appear in UnivPress Rankings (or Heti Válasz ranking for that matter).

For example, the authors of the HVG higher education ranking take the following aspects into account: the number of first-time applicants, the average (admission) score of students admitted, the proportion of students admitted with a foreign language certificate, the proportion of teachers with a doctoral degree, the number of students per teacher, and the proportion of lecturers with a Hungarian Academy of Sciences title. The Heti Válasz ranking shows the income level of former students and types of employment of graduated students, while UnivPress rankings includes the quality of educators based on habilitation and achieved titles from the Academy of Sciences among the faculty. Both rankings prioritize data important for incoming students (Csoka et al. 2019 p. 753).

National vs international publications

International rankings predominantly take research factors into account because they are more quantifiable, while Hungarian national rankings prioritize other factors (e.g., student feedback, employability, etc) (see e.g. https://tka.hu/nemzetkozi/9526/ranking and Csoka et al. 2019).

Societal impact

The ranking systems do not take into account the societal impact of SSH fields.

SSH-relevant research output types excluded by the policy

Publications, citations and impact of research are not considered (as described above). One study (Csoka et al. 2019) proposes the use of MTMT data for such purposes. MTMT, or “Magyar Tudományos Művek Tára” (Hungarian Scientific Bibliography), is a “comprehensive national bibliographic database of scientific publications and citations” that has been collecting data from researchers and institutions since 1999 (Micsik and Kovács 2013)

Evaluation-based funding

In Hungary, the government provides public funding to universities in accordance with the Act on Higher Education. This funding is based on state-determined tuition fees for students enrolled in self-financed programs, and the total amount is calculated by multiplying the fees by the number of students in state-subsidized programs. This calculation determines the state subsidy that each institution receives. Aside from public funding, universities also have access to tuition fees paid by self-financing students and income generated from their economic activities.

The amount of funding provided to universities may vary by +/- 10% depending on whether a high or low proportion (+/- 25%) of the institution’s former graduates have found employment in their respective fields of study, compared to the national average. Employment is measured through the Diplomás Pályakövető Rendszer, a graduate career monitoring system that has been in place for almost a decade. However, it is unclear if adjustments are made to support based on employment rates. In addition to the aforementioned funding, the state provides other subsidies on a normative basis, such as funding for student dormitories, accommodation, textbooks, sports and cultural activities, and scholarships. Moreover, universities may receive additional support based on individual agreements or through an application for support. For instance, the University of Public Service (Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem) has funding earmarked in a separate budget as per the Act on the Annual National Budget.

As of 1 September 2021, the financing of higher education was amended in accordance with Act CXLVIII of 2020 (on the regulation of higher education and the amendment of certain related acts). Under the new regulations, the funding framework is established through an agreement between the Minister responsible for education and the higher education institution maintainer. Notably, the previous student-based support has been replaced with a new system that provides support for scientific research, artistic creative activities, and relevant maintenance and operational activities.

According to the legal document, the support for educational activities is calculated as follows:

  • Student-based support: based on the number of students
  • Support for scientific research and artistic activities: based on the number of teachers and researchers and performance in agreements under paragraph 2

(See here.)

According to a leading expert on higher education, the current changes in the higher education sector resulted in financial support to HEIs being calculated based on a series of complex indicators; a monitoring system was put in place that oversees government financing. An agreement between the minister responsible for HE and the maintainer of HEIs is signed for 6 years, which allows universities to plan their long-term spending. If the institution does not fulfil its set goals, the next cycle of funding may be adjusted to compensate for the shortcoming. Ranking plays no role in this funding scheme, but scientific output does: one of the indicators is the scientometric data that reflects scientific outputs and results, which will have an effect on state financing.

(The information in this section is based on Eurydice and Magyar Közlöny, an official journal which belongs to the Editorial Board at the Ministry of Administration and Justice, and publishes measures and other documents, as well as an interview with a leading local expert.)

State Evaluation Systems

State Evaluation Systems

 State policies for evaluation of research outputs

The Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC), which is a “a national body of experts facilitating the control, assurance and evaluation of the scientific quality of education, scientific research and artistic activity at higher education institutions”, was established in 1993. It is responsible for the supervision, assurance, and evaluation of the quality of higher education, scientific research and the scientific quality of artistic creation in higher education institutions, with a special regard to doctoral schools. The Committee also carries out an evaluation of the doctoral schools. More specifically, the Accreditation Committee’s president and members “receive their letters of appointment from the Prime Minister for a six-year term, which is once renewable… HAC has a Financial Supervisory Board, and since its inception … an International Advisory Board. The Secretariat has a staff of 15… In compliance with the European Standards and Guidelines, the HAC was evaluated by an external team of experts in 2008/09 and consequently has renewed its membership in ENQA, the European Association of Quality Assurance for another five-year term”. (Source: http://old.mab.hu/web/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=224&Itemid=733&lang=en.)

HAC’s mission statement says that “during its operation, HAC considers the legislation on higher education, performs its dedicated tasks, complies with the criteria set in the ESG 2015, and applies the objective, complex and up-to-date criteria developed by the HAC expert commissions and the Board. With its activities, HAC reinforces its independent operation, and applies, develops and/or adapts a methodology in evaluation in line with international standards.”

Importantly, the primary task of HAC is quality control; it has no impact on the state’s financial support of universities. Notably, a recent article criticized the Committee for its lack of political independence. Also, there has criticism that the criteria of the evaluation used by HAC have increasingly disregarded quality and quantity of academic research.

Approaches to SSH as compared to STEM

In terms of the evaluation of university professor applications, the evaluation forms and criteria are set differently for various fields. Evaluation forms for the following disciplines are listed separately:

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Humanities
  • Business and Management, Economic Sciences, Regional Studies
  • Theology
  • Arts
  • Medicine and Health sciences
  • Sports Sciences
  • Engineering and Technology
  • Administration and Law
  • Military Sciences
  • Media and Communication Studies
  • Public Administration and Police Studies
  • Political Science and Sociology
  • Natural Sciences

Approaches to different institution types

The policy in question does not differentiate between institution types.

Scientometric/bibliometric channels

Academic achievements and publications are relevant for the evaluation of teachers in higher education. Citations are considered as appearing in the Science Citation Index (SCI); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI); Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI), Hungarian Scientific Bibliography Database.

National vs international publications

“Foreign language publications” is one of the requirements for the evaluation of teachers in higher education, however, no information on ranking weight is included.

Societal impact

Innovations are mentioned in the requirements for the evaluation of teachers in higher education.

SSH-relevant research output types excluded by the policy

HAC does not consider the following scientific achievements and publications:

  • Ones appearing in daily or non-professional weekly papers or journals (even if they are subject-specific)
  • Non-peer reviewed self-published editions
  • Textbooks and support material, such as handouts and examples, or compilations, editorial work, etc.
  • Single-page texts in conference publications or posters
  • Books and other translations (with the exception of translations from classical languages that also contain scholarly commentary)
  • Book reviews or critiques (with the exception of extensive artistic reviews)
  • Research reports for projects or commissioned work
  • Theses or dissertations
  • Any other manuscripts
  • Popular science publications
  • Interviews (where the applicant is either the reporter or interview subject) carried out for non-scientific purposes
  • Forthcoming publications
  • Artistic performances or productions not publicly shown

Evaluation-based funding

There is no link between the official evaluation policies and funding.

Regulation and Funding

General Data

General data

Number of academic institutions

  • Universities: In Hungary, the number of state-recognized higher education institutions is 64 (according to the updated Appendix of the Act CCIV of 2011 on National Higher Education). In addition, there are 16 foreign higher education institutions in Hungary that operate with a bilateral agreement between the two states (institutions’ home government and Hungary), according to the Educational Authority database.
  • Academies of sciences: There is only one Academy of Sciences, the research institutions of which were recently transferred to the newly established Eötvös Loránd Research Network(ELKH).
  • Universities with SSH faculties/departments (see here, p. 12):
    • Social sciences: 27
    • Humanities: 17
  • Also, the Hungarian Academy of Sciences has a Centre for Social Sciences and a Research Centre for the Humanities.

Staff numbers

The number of lecturers and teachers in higher education institutions is 23.500 (of which 63% of instructors are employed full-time, 8.2% part-time and 28% on a contract basis), according to the Central Statistical Office.

Expenditure for education and research

  • Total: The Hungarian Central Statistical Office indicated that the total expenditure on education of the Hungarian budgetary institutions in 2019 was 1.841.174 million HUF (or 4500 million EUR, by June 2022 exchange rate).
  • GDP%: according to EUROSTAT, the total general government expenditure on education in 2019 as GDP percentage in Hungary was 4.7%. For 2020 the Hungarian Central Statistical Office indicated that the expenditure on education of the Hungarian budgetary institutions as GDP percentage was 3.8% (as preliminary data). In 2015, the direct government budget for R&D as a percentage of GDP was 0.48% (OECD).
  • Total per capita: according to OECD data, in 2018 Hungary invested a total of USD 7,153 per student on primary to tertiary institutions.

Regulation Framework

Regulation framework

Policies

According to the Higher Education Act, the main activities of higher education institutions in Hungary are: education, academic research and artistic creation. “The 2014 Higher Education Strategy points out key areas for policy action around teacher training, closer interaction with the local labour market and community, and new forms of vertical and horizontal partnerships in HEIs to build and nurture synergies between education, research and third mission activities” (OECD 2017, p.23). The Strategy delineates a research-development innovation focus. This strategy involves aspects such as increasing the number of researchers, supporting new innovative enterprises, and improving the competitiveness of research and technological development (RTD) workshops.

The government Strategy names the following areas of higher education as strategically important training areas: medical and pedagogical training, technical, economic and agricultural training. These fields will likely receive more attention from various funding schemes.

In terms of funding, as of September 2021, the educational funding in HE is based on the number of students. It is complemented with separate funding for research and infrastructure, based on this Government announcement. As mentioned above, according to a leading expert on higher education, the current changes in the higher education sector resulted in financial support for HEIs being calculated based on series of complex indicators; a monitoring system was put in place that oversees government financing. An agreement is signed between the minister responsible for HE and the maintainer of HEIs for 6 years, which allows universities to plan their spending on a long-term scale. If the institution does not fulfil its set goals, the next cycle of funding may be adjusted to compensate for the shortcoming. Ranking plays no role in this funding scheme, but scientific output does: among the indicators there is scientometric data that reflects scientific outputs and results, which will have an effect on state financing. Higher education institutions also benefitted from the Action plan to relaunch the economy in the form of funding for purchasing assets, machines and equipment and on setting up laboratories.

Legislation

The Ministry of Innovation and Technology is responsible for school-based vocational education in the field of adult education and higher education. The Act CCIV of 2011 on National Higher Education is the primary regulation, which states that “the state shall be responsible for ensuring the operation of the system of higher education, while the responsibility for ensuring the operation of higher education institutions shall lie with their maintainers” (chapter 1, section 2, article 2).

In Hungary, there are two types of tertiary institutions: non-university institutions (colleges) and universities. Higher education institutions can be state-owned or run by legal entities determined by the law. These can include: a) the Hungarian state, national minority self-governments, b) ecclesiastical legal persons (“ecclesiastical maintainers”), c) companies established in the territory of Hungary, d) foundations, public foundations and organizations engaged in religious activities registered in Hungary.

The state-owned HEIs are accountable to, and receive funding from the Ministry of Human Capacities, and non-state HEIs can be established and operated by enterprises, foundations, public foundations, public interest trusts, organisations engaged in religious activities, and maintenance bodies.

Based on the 2021. IX Decree. About Foundations of Public Tasks, significant changes in the state funding of Higher Education in Hungary were made, with several state Higher Education institutions soon to be maintained by foundations. This means an upcoming change in the operational and funding model. The list of such universities has been published. Currently, according to the Education Office, among the recognised higher education institutions in Hungary in 2021, currently there are 17 state (public) universities and universities of applied sciences, 21 non-state (private) universities and universities of applied sciences; 1 state (public) college and 24 non-state (private) colleges.

The Hungarian HE system made a commitment to the European Higher Education Area and Bologna process. Academic degrees are following the three-cycle degree structure, in accordance with the Bologna Declaration that Hungary signed in 1999 (and it was introduced in September 2006). Furthermore, the higher education system adheres to the Qualifications Framework of the European Higher Education Area and the European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning (EQF), which means that after acquiring the Bachelor’s (BA/BSc) level (6-8 semesters, EQF level 6), students can pursue a Master’s (MA/MSc) degree (4 semesters, EQF level 7), followed by the third cycle—a doctoral program (EQF level 8) (Eurydice).

Academic employees in public positions in HEIs are considered public sector employees and thus public servants. In higher education institutions, the rector has the employer’s right, regarding both education and academic research. In general, requirements for those employed in HEIs are stipulated in the Act CCIV of 2011 on National Higher Education and the higher education institution’s requirements of employment. They are usually based on academic achievement and academic degree as prerequisites of advancement.

Academic ranks and promotion both depend on experience in teaching and research. Achieving “habilitation”, a second major piece of research after the doctorate, is a requirement for applying for a professorship. The Habilitation committee, which grants the degree, is set up by individual institutions, and thus individual institutions oversee the process. University professors are (officially) appointed by the President of the Republic of Hungary (although the institutions advertise for their own staff) (source: European University Institute, “Hungary, Academic Career Structure”).

National classification system of academic fields

There is no national classification system of academic fields in Hungary; however, see the list of academic domains subject to evaluation used by the Hungarian Accreditation Committee above.

Funding Framework

Funding framework

Funding actors

The most important funder of HEIs is the state, but other forms of funding are also possible and described in the next section.

Funding forms

According to the Act on Higher Education, apart from state-provided support, which is included in the annual national budget, HEIs can generate income from tuition fees paid by their self-financing students and from the income of their activities. In addition, the state offers normative subsidies (for students’ dormitories, accommodation, textbooks, sport and cultural activities, and scholarships). The Act states that fees charged should be determined by the rules on fees and allowances, “on the basis of which the student and the higher education institution shall lay down the amount payable in an agreement” (chapter 23, section 51, article 83). Institutions have autonomy to set their own fees: “The rules for organisation and operation shall contain the rules which form the basis of the rector’s decision, in the case of students participating in self-funded programmes, on the benefits due on the basis of academic results, or available on the basis of social needs, and the permission for payment in instalments” (chapter 23, section 51, article 83). Furthermore, private higher education institutions that are not operating as public benefit organisations perform their activities (performance of educational, academic research and creative artistic activities) as business activities, and therefore can make profit, the distribution of which is determined by the maintainer in the founding charter (chapter 26, section 95, para. 1).

The 389/2016 Decree on Financing of Higher Educational institutions applies to state, church and private HEIs alike, and it details the calculations behind state subsidies. Non-state higher education institutions are eligible for state support under an agreement with the state. The Decree also stipulates additional funding for students with disabilities.

As of September 2021, universities can also receive funding for research and infrastructure; the new higher education funding system to be introduced soon will support research activities of the institutions, and the maintenance of the infrastructure will also receive a separate form of funding, based on the announcement of the Minister for Innovation and Technology.

Financial support for students and researchers

The current student normative in higher education is 166,600 HUF (increased from 128,520 HUF), which roughly equals to 410 EUR (increased from 317 EUR) (by June 2022 exchange rate).

Support for students of HEIs is regulated by the following regulations:

Scholarships are based on student performance calculated in points; disadvantaged, disabled students and students on maternity leave applying for admission receive additional 40 points, thus becoming more likely to receive a full or partial scholarship. In addition, there are other specific forms of student support (see here).

To support research in HE, the National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NRDI) offers a list of competitive funding schemes. Namely, “A coherent portfolio of competitive calls was implemented by the NRDI Office to facilitate the regulated, predictable and purpose-oriented use of RDI funds coming from EU sources and the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund (NRDI Fund). The calls of the portfolio developed from RDI sources in view of strategic considerations provide funding only to proposals that meet strict assessment criteria. The calls promote research excellence, corporate development and innovation, researcher-industry cooperation as well as the implementation of innovative ideas” (NRDI website; the site lists the funding options and sources of funding).

To support academics, in 1996 the Hungarian Government established Tempus Public Foundation (TPF), a non-profit organization with the task of managing international cooperation programmes and special projects in the field of education, training and EU-related issues; among its main activities are management of scholarship and cooperation programmes.

In 2020, a Research Fund was established by the government to support “socially useful research projects, research excellence goals, higher education institutions and research institutes. Individual research excellence programs are funded from the Research Fund”. Funds are distributed partly in the form of tenders, but corporate innovation and market-oriented research and development activities (partly implemented jointly by the academic and corporate sectors) will also be funded.

There is no statistics on funding available within disciplines.

Cost of education

According to the Higher Education Act of 2011, there are three categories of HE students:

  • Students with full state scholarship
  • Students financed partially through a state scholarship
  • Students who pay full tuition fee

Scholarships are competitive and applicants with the best performance in their previous studies may receive state scholarship. The number of students who receive either state scholarship or partial state scholarships is regulated annually by a government decree. Importantly, scholarships have conditions: “The condition of the state scholarship is that the students receiving it (excluding those participating in religious studies) undertake to work for a Hungarian employer for the same period as the duration of the payment of the scholarship within twenty years of obtaining their diploma. Otherwise, they will have to repay the valorised value of their scholarship. … If a student in a full/partial scholarship programme does not obtain a degree during 1.5 times the study period required for the given training, they must repay 50% of their scholarship. If students participating in a full/partial scholarship programme discontinue their studies, or a student continues their studies in the form of self-financing for any reason, other students formerly participating in self-financed programmes may take their places upon request, if their academic performance entitles them to do so” (source: Euridice, https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/national-reforms-higher-education-29_en, accessed: March 2023).

The range of tuition fees is set by the state for students participating in self-financed programmes, and institutions set the exact fee. The extent of tuition fees currently is summarized by Felvi.hu, based on these institutions and faculties/departments.

Conclusion

Some disciplines have a better reputation than others. Humanities disciplines have had a negative reputation in Hungary, sometimes being referred to as “büfészak” (“buffet major”) ironically (Mickey Mouse course is perhaps an apt translation from the British culture), implying that some of these majors are easily completed and have little to no relevance to the job market. In 2012, PM Viktor Orban also claimed that there are too many unemployed college graduates, mainly referring to those with humanities training.

In terms of funding, the government seems to provide targeted support based on its goals of developing certain professions or universities. For example, in 2017, the Ministry of Justice announced that it would provide HUF 500 million (roughly EUR 1,234,200, June 2022 exchange rate) to support the faculties of law, of which 225 million will be used to improve young people’s interest in legal training at rural universities through a scholarship program. Budapest-based universities are leading in popularity and such initiatives may strive to offset this trend.

Overall, Hungarian higher education politics have been criticized lately for strengthening the control of Fidesz (Hungarian right-wing political party) and PM Viktor Orban over the higher education system (see for example NYT and Balkan Insight), especially through the transfer of control of several state universities to quasi-public foundations which are led by political allies of the governing party there.